In the random orifice of time (change)
Submitted by no_exit on Fri, 05/23/2008 - 2:31pm.
Q: Do you believe this poem?
A: I'll believe anything with a fluctuating rate of change.
Q: So you agree that metaphors are reversible?
A: Only when time-reversed dynamics are well defined.
Q: But shouldn't they commence from a given state?
A: Listen closely to Mu second part, then ask again.
pause (27:33)
Q: But shouldn't they commence from a given state?
A: Yes, in a random field of continuously changing values.
Q: And why is that field so inflective?
A: These higher order chains tend to generate results with a sense of phrasal structure.
Q: Like the first 20,000 letters of "Eugene Onegin"?
A: No, like the flute and voice in teo-teo can.
do I have to wait 27:33 to
do I have to wait 27:33 to read the second half?
well, yes. Did you cheat?
well, yes. Did you cheat?
of course I cheated. Silly.
of course I cheated. Silly.
woah. let me read this one
woah. let me read this one again. maybe this poem is too smart for me. as always, intriguing, unique.
It was...
...way too smart for me. :)